‘Disruptions due to coal transport prioritisation should not be ruled out’

Image: Flickr Rob Dammers

Everything goes according to the plan regarding coal transport by rail, says Deutsche Bahn. The federal government’s prioritisation plans seem to be working with the country’s first major energy production plants receiving regular trains. However, delays or train cancellations due to the priority corridors should not be ruled out, said the federal government’s parliamentary state secretary and logistics commissioner, Oliver Luksic.

Do you want to read this article?

Create a free account and get access to all RailFreight Premium content until 1 May!

Author: Nikos Papatolios

Nikos Papatolios is editor of RailFreight.com, the online magazine for rail freight professionals.

1 comment op “‘Disruptions due to coal transport prioritisation should not be ruled out’”

bönström bönström|26.10.22|14:36

Track capacity, as well as added utilisation of assets, remain Priority – regardless of current energy crisis,
For railways, by nature short of redundancy, resilency – and of robustness, now a decisive upgrading of infrastructure, since long, has been needed…
At any current investment , however standards have to prove optimal, thus to meet with requests clients supply chains , where risks means costs – inflation, etc.
(For majority, now on road trucks is single available alternative.)

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.

‘Disruptions due to coal transport prioritisation should not be ruled out’ | RailFreight.com

‘Disruptions due to coal transport prioritisation should not be ruled out’

Image: Flickr Rob Dammers

Everything goes according to the plan regarding coal transport by rail, says Deutsche Bahn. The federal government’s prioritisation plans seem to be working with the country’s first major energy production plants receiving regular trains. However, delays or train cancellations due to the priority corridors should not be ruled out, said the federal government’s parliamentary state secretary and logistics commissioner, Oliver Luksic.

Do you want to read the full article?

Are you already a member?

Log in

Do you have a free account? With a free account, you had access to read all premium content on RailFreight.com for free until 1 May 2023. From 1 May onwards you need a paid membership to read all premium articles. Questions? Call +31(0)10 280 1000 or see the FAQ.

 

Author: Nikos Papatolios

Nikos Papatolios is editor of RailFreight.com, the online magazine for rail freight professionals.

1 comment op “‘Disruptions due to coal transport prioritisation should not be ruled out’”

bönström bönström|26.10.22|14:36

Track capacity, as well as added utilisation of assets, remain Priority – regardless of current energy crisis,
For railways, by nature short of redundancy, resilency – and of robustness, now a decisive upgrading of infrastructure, since long, has been needed…
At any current investment , however standards have to prove optimal, thus to meet with requests clients supply chains , where risks means costs – inflation, etc.
(For majority, now on road trucks is single available alternative.)

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.