Port chaos in Europe keeps rail freight operations on the edge
Hamburg and Bremerhaven ports still face chaos following continuous strikes and infrastructure issues, causing “disastrous consequences” to operators like METRANS. As if that was not enough, Adriatic ports also met immense traffic restrictions, which the Slovenian infrastructure manager fortunately lifted.
Despite things getting better for the Ports of Koper and Trieste, the Northern German ports’ situation is not similar. For Koper and Trieste, the issue was complicated but with a simple solution. A few days ago, the Slovenian infrastructure manager announced a ban on loading cargo in the country’s territory due to an overload.
As a result, no trains could be dispatched from the Adriatic ports using the Slovenian railway network. Nevertheless, faced with the possibility of multiple cancelled services and a massive backlog of shipments afterwards, the Slovenian IM reversed the decision and allowed companies to dispatch trains again. Yet, operators must expect more cancellations in Germany.
Dozens of trains cancelled
As mentioned before, the German ports have been struggling for quite some time. The main problems occur by a combination of factors that include strikes, infrastructure malfunctions stranding trains outside port infrastructure and even natural phenomena such as storms closing down rail lines to and from the ports.
As a result, the ports of Hamburg and Bremerhaven did not manage to avoid what the ports of Trieste and Koper did. “Due to the completely overcrowded infrastructure, access to the port of Hamburg is limited. HPA and individual terminals will negotiate the acceptance of each train with the operators,” explained METRANS, which experiences much of the nuisance.
Namely, the company has 18 trains waiting in line to enter the ports of Hamburg and Bremerhaven. However, to do that, it’s forced to cancel or postpone at least 18 more trains to free up capacity and equipment for the already delayed or cancelled trains.
Also read:
Sad it is, that infrastructure managers have “missed the train”.
At a “pro rail” era, as currently, offensive pays.
By offensive, easier it is to attract, as well qualified staff, as customers.
(Ware owners, clients, handsomely rewards, high quality, low risk service rendered, etc., etc.)
In any case, an upgraded “New Old Railway, a safely sustainable, needed is, where the current costly, “predictive” (the suboptimal…) maintenance (repairing) is reduced to min. the optimal, etc., etc.