Kisby freight train collision: driver did not telephone signaller

Cambridge crash cab (RAIB)Image Rail Accident Investigations Branch

UK’s Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) has issued its report on the collision between an intermodal working and an agricultural equipment trailer at Kisby, an accident that happened on 19 August last year. RAIB has addressed both Network Rail and the UK Health and Safety Executive over the serious shortcomings exposed by the accident.

On 19 August 2020, the early departure (04:10 hrs) intermodal freight train service from Hams Hall Birmingham to the Port of Felixstowe collided with agricultural machinery being towed over the railway by a tractor at the Kisby user worked crossing. The rural location lies between Whittlesey and March in Cambridgeshire.

Get ‘orff my railway! Farmer’s trespass ends in sorry harvest in Cambridgeshire collision with class 66 (RAIB)

The train was travelling at about 66 mph (106 kph) when it struck the machinery. The train driver suffered minor injuries in the accident. The tractor driver was uninjured. The locomotive and one wagon derailed, with both suffering some damage. There was also extensive damage to the infrastructure of the railway. The train driver escaped greater harm by swiftly taking refuge behind a acb bulkhead in the moments before collision.

Land owner not briefing crossing users

In their findings, the RAIB put the accident down to the actions of the road user. “The accident happened because the tractor driver did not telephone the signaller before crossing the railway to seek permission to cross”, noted the official report.

Graphic from RAIB report

“This was a consequence of the tractor driver not being briefed about the requirement to call the signaller and his belief that he could cross safely by looking for approaching trains”, said the RAIB. “This probably arose because the authorised user, the person owning land on both sides of the level crossing, was not briefing crossing users in a way which resulted in correct use of the crossing, and railway staff were unaware that this was the case until shortly before the accident.”

Safety watchdog makes two recommendations

RAIB found that the infrastructure management agency Network Rail was not effectively managing the safe use of Kisby. There were also identified shortcomings at some other user worked crossings with telephones. RAIB said that this was an underlying factor for the accident.

Quick thinking from the driver avoided injury, and he even managed to apply the brakes. Image RAIB report

As a result of its investigation, RAIB has made two recommendations, one addressed to Network Rail and one addressed to the Health and Safety Executive. These seek improvements in the management and assurance processes applied to user worked crossings. They also require additional means of communicating crossing safety information to agricultural workers. RAIB has also written to several organisations representing farmers asking that they remind their members of the importance of following correct procedures at user worked crossings.

Do you want to read the full article?

Are you already a member?

Log in

Do you have a free account? With a free account, you had access to read all premium content on RailFreight.com for free until 1 May 2023. From 1 May onwards you need a paid membership to read all premium articles. Questions? Call +31(0)10 280 1000 or see the FAQ.

 

Author: Simon Walton

Simon Walton is RailFreight's UK correspondent.

1 comment op “Kisby freight train collision: driver did not telephone signaller”

Tony Froude|02.11.22|21:32

At which point did common sense not prevail ??🙄

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.

Kisby freight train collision: driver did not telephone signaller | RailFreight.com

Kisby freight train collision: driver did not telephone signaller

Cambridge crash cab (RAIB)Image Rail Accident Investigations Branch

UK’s Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) has issued its report on the collision between an intermodal working and an agricultural equipment trailer at Kisby, an accident that happened on 19 August last year. RAIB has addressed both Network Rail and the UK Health and Safety Executive over the serious shortcomings exposed by the accident.

On 19 August 2020, the early departure (04:10 hrs) intermodal freight train service from Hams Hall Birmingham to the Port of Felixstowe collided with agricultural machinery being towed over the railway by a tractor at the Kisby user worked crossing. The rural location lies between Whittlesey and March in Cambridgeshire.

Get ‘orff my railway! Farmer’s trespass ends in sorry harvest in Cambridgeshire collision with class 66 (RAIB)

The train was travelling at about 66 mph (106 kph) when it struck the machinery. The train driver suffered minor injuries in the accident. The tractor driver was uninjured. The locomotive and one wagon derailed, with both suffering some damage. There was also extensive damage to the infrastructure of the railway. The train driver escaped greater harm by swiftly taking refuge behind a acb bulkhead in the moments before collision.

Land owner not briefing crossing users

In their findings, the RAIB put the accident down to the actions of the road user. “The accident happened because the tractor driver did not telephone the signaller before crossing the railway to seek permission to cross”, noted the official report.

Graphic from RAIB report

“This was a consequence of the tractor driver not being briefed about the requirement to call the signaller and his belief that he could cross safely by looking for approaching trains”, said the RAIB. “This probably arose because the authorised user, the person owning land on both sides of the level crossing, was not briefing crossing users in a way which resulted in correct use of the crossing, and railway staff were unaware that this was the case until shortly before the accident.”

Safety watchdog makes two recommendations

RAIB found that the infrastructure management agency Network Rail was not effectively managing the safe use of Kisby. There were also identified shortcomings at some other user worked crossings with telephones. RAIB said that this was an underlying factor for the accident.

Quick thinking from the driver avoided injury, and he even managed to apply the brakes. Image RAIB report

As a result of its investigation, RAIB has made two recommendations, one addressed to Network Rail and one addressed to the Health and Safety Executive. These seek improvements in the management and assurance processes applied to user worked crossings. They also require additional means of communicating crossing safety information to agricultural workers. RAIB has also written to several organisations representing farmers asking that they remind their members of the importance of following correct procedures at user worked crossings.

Do you want to read the full article?

Are you already a member?

Log in

Do you have a free account? With a free account, you had access to read all premium content on RailFreight.com for free until 1 May 2023. From 1 May onwards you need a paid membership to read all premium articles. Questions? Call +31(0)10 280 1000 or see the FAQ.

 

Author: Simon Walton

Simon Walton is RailFreight's UK correspondent.

1 comment op “Kisby freight train collision: driver did not telephone signaller”

Tony Froude|02.11.22|21:32

At which point did common sense not prevail ??🙄

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.