An underwater railway line from the USA to China: a dream project?
A 13,000km-long railway line from China to the USA, running partially underwater to cover the Bering Strait. It would be the finishing touch of the Belt and Road initiative, as it would connect the world by rail. But that will never happen, most of the RailFreight readers said in a poll on the website this week. Only a small number of people had full confidence in the project, which has been discussed since 2014 and seems to have more people talking than actually building.
It is called the China-Russia-Canada-America line, and China first proposed it in 2014. It would start in mainland China, run through Siberia, pass under the sea through the Bering Strait into Alaska, to continue to Canada and finally the USA. It is not to be confused with the Bering Strait Tunnel, which is only the part crossing the Bering Strait. This has been on the wishlist of engineers for centuries. InterBering, an Alaska-based company, is actively working to realise the Bering Strait Tunnel.
8% of global cargo volumes
Constructing the China-Russia-Canada-America railway line could provide capacity for up to 100 million tons of freight, or 8 per cent of world freight cargo each year between Europe, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, Canada and the USA. Moreover, it would enable passengers to travel between the USA and Russia in just a little over 20 minutes if high-speed trains would run on the network. It is also dubbed the Global Land Bridge, as it would connect the world, advocate those proposing the project.
However, it is not surprising that the majority of the RailFreight readers voted with little confidence in the project (56%). Technically, the project is very challenging, the costs are sky-high, and maybe most importantly, the political relations between the USA, Russia and China are not at the very best. What is more, it is not entirely clear who is to construct the tunnel, as various parties seem to have their respective ambitions.
Technically, the crossover at the Bering Strait is the most challenging task. If an underwater tunnel were constructed here, it would be the longest in the world, extending over 103km. In comparison, the Channel Tunnel, currently the world’s longest, is 50km long. InterBering, an Alaska-based company, seems to be actively working on the project.
The project would actually involve constructing three parallel tunnels under the Bering Strait, along with sections of railway linking to the rail systems on each of the two continents. InterBering writes. “Two tunnels would accommodate two-way traffic and consist of two levels: the bottom part for slower-moving cargo and passenger traffic, and an upper level for high-speed rail trains. The third tunnel would function as an emergency tunnel and be placed in the middle.”
InterBering says to “integrate information and management processes with particular focus on the organisation, financing and construction of an interhemispheric Bering Strait tunnel and joining the railways of two continents, North America and Asia”. According to the company, the project would take 12-15 years, at an estimated 35 billion US Dollars cost.
The costly elements
However, that includes the underwater link alone. To make this a global land bridge connecting China and the USA, new infrastructure needs to be laid, as there are currently many missing links. On the Russian side, the closest terminus lies 3,000km away, while in Alaska, the project would require some 1,200km of new rail line. What makes things more complicated is that Russian and American railways use different track gauges, writes Ed Peters in the South China Morning Post.
It is this missing infrastructure that makes the project a huge financial challenge. The estimated total costs are around 200 billion US Dollars, which according to the critics, is out of proportion. As the shipping routes already exist, it is more viable to continue shipping by ocean, is the often-heard argument of opponents.
Different actors involved
Although Interbering claims to “actively bring about a historic agreement between the Governors of the State of Alaska (USA) and Chukotka Autonomous Okrug (Russia), making this proposed rail tunnel a future reality, China seems to be on a completely different page.
As mentioned, China announced its plans to build the China-Russia-Canada-America line in 2014. At the time, engineers from China claimed to be in talks with Russia about beginning the line. Moreover, it currently realises the world’s first underwater bullet train, which would extend from Ningbo, a port city near Shanghai, to Zhoushan, an archipelago of islands off the East coast. Many consider this a test project to see whether they could realise the longer Bering Strait Tunnel.
The Ningbo-Zhoushan tunnel is 77km long, of which 16.2km is situated underwater. Although the underwater section is shorter than the Channel Tunnel, the novelty is that it will facilitate high-speed rail traffic. To be precise, it will have a Maglev train, levitating above a magnetic track as it is propelled along at high speeds. And this is not a dream project, as it is already underway.
Political will from all sides
China and Russia are not unlikely to cooperate in this project. After all, they already share the longest railway line in the world: the Trans-Siberia Line. The two countries have worked together very closely over the past few years to form a bridge between Europe and Asia, and a railway line to the USA would be an extension of this effort.
However, the willingness of the USA to work with Russia and China on this megaproject is less likely. Currently, the relationship between the USA and Russia is not at its best, and as China is taking over as the dominant economic player in the world, the USA may not be so eager to facilitate this growth.
At the same time, the benefits will be for all the countries involved. “The Bering Strait rail and tunnel project can help enhance and expand prosperity for the 21st Century by linking the world’s greatest industrial nations with the vast untapped mineral resources of the Arctic”, said Alaska’s Governor Wally Hickel.
To realise the project, the countries involved will all have to chip in and contribute. Before consensus is reached and funding is made available from all sides, the China-Russia-Canada-America line is likely to remain a dream project.
Want to know more?
Do you want to read more about traffic to and from China? At RailFreight.com, we write a lot about this topic. Do you want to make sure you do not miss out? Then you can subscribe to our newsletter.
The original Poll asks whether it is realistic ‘to build a 13,000 km. long underwater railway line to the USA’ (from China). This is badly worded as it implies that the whole tunnel is underwater i.e. built under the Pacific Ocean!
My response would have been completely different if it had stated that about 64 miles of the route is under the Bering Sea, so it would only be twice as long as the Channel Tunnel. The project would probably be feasible depending on the depth of the Bering Strait.
The original Poll asks whether it is realistic to ‘build a 13,000 km long underwater railway line to the USA’ (from China). This is badly worded as it implies that the whole tunnel is underwater (spanning the Pacific Ocean!)
My response would have been completely different if it had stated that only about 64 miles of the tunnel would be under the Bering Strait. This is close to being twice as long as the Channel Tunnel, and so sounds feasible depending on e.g. the depth of the Bering Strait.
This is my opinion. China is never going to do this railroad under ground ,because of San Andreas fault runs from Alaska to Chile. It can happen on the Eastern coast to Europe. There is no fault.