accident aftermath

Manchester derailment prompts urgent bridge safety review across UK

An RAIB officer displays a broken screw at Audenshaw, exhibiting fracture characteristics, which prompted the Urgent Safety Advice RAIB / UK Government

A UK government department has taken the unusual step of issuing an official “Urgent Safety Advice” following the derailment of an aggregates train in Manchester in September. The warning is the first such directive of the year. It comes while the official investigation into the accident is still underway. The safety critical level of concern has prompted the immediate warning.

A massively disruptive derailment prompted the call for bridge track work inspections across Britain. Following the derailment in the Audenshaw neighbourhood of Manchester, the UK government’s accident watchdog has warned that other bridges could be susceptible to the same circumstances. That has led to the issue of an Urgent Safety Advice, recommending the immediate inspection of similar infrastructure around the network.

Duty holders take urgent steps

The Rail Accident Investigation Branch is still working on the accident. However, they have issued a warning that existing inspection and maintenance regimes may not be sufficient to detect the failure of critical components. In certain installations, such as that found on the Sidmouth Street bridge, “baseplate chair screws” could fail, which can lead to a loss of lateral track support in longitudinal timber systems. The screws, holding track in place on certain common bridge designs with timber elements, could be in danger of a similar failure to the one that badly derailed an aggregates train in September. There could be wider infrastructure implications if at-risk installations are found elsewhere.

A badly damaged hopper wagon at Audenshaw, Manchester, in the days after the accident. Image: © DB Cargo UK

The RAIB has recommended that all ‘duty holders’ should take urgent steps to consider and mitigate this risk. Those responsible parties principally include the national infrastructure agency Network Rail, upon whom the greatest burden of care will fall. The directive also covers other infrastructure managers, and those companies responsible for maintaining or inspecting longitudinal timber systems.

Gauge spread and broken screws

The accident that prompted the warning happened in the late morning of 6 September this year. “At around 11:25, a freight train travelling between Peak Forest and Salford derailed as it passed over a bridge in Audenshaw, Manchester,” said an RAIB statement. “The train involved was made up of two class 66 locomotives and 24 wagons, which were loaded with aggregate. The locomotives and the leading ten wagons passed safely over the bridge. The next nine wagons derailed, with the last of these coming to a stand on the bridge itself.”

Operations to lift one of the derailed wagons at Audenshaw. Image: © DB Cargo UK

No injuries were caused by the accident. However, the derailment caused substantial damage to railway infrastructure and damaged some of the wagons. “The evidence available at this stage to RAIB’s investigation indicates that the derailment was caused by gauge spread within the first half of the bridge, with the track having transferred from ballasted track to a longitudinal timber system as the train entered the bridge,” said the investigators.

Faults almost impossible to detect

The track geometry at this location is quite complicated. According to the RAIB report, the line curves with a radius of approximately 480 metres and an installed cant of around 40mm. The rails on the bridge were supported on “PAN M6” baseplates held to the timber by only two LSA chair screws. The RAIB recovered 13 failed LSA chair screws from the baseplates of the low-side rail. None of these screws were marked with ‘HT’ on their heads, which indicates that they were probably not made of high-tensile strength material.

Fracture face of the upper portion of a recovered screw with indications of unidirectional high-cycle and low-cycle bending fatigue and a small area of overload (circled). Image: © RAIB / UK Government

Preliminary metallurgical analysis of these failed chair screws exhibit signs of what the specialists call both “low-cycle and high-cycle fatigue failure”. A number of them also exhibited fracturing by overload. In most cases, these failures were one or two threads below the shanks, making them almost impossible to see on visual inspection.

Likely disruptions unavoidable

The RAIB says this type of failure has been seen previously in different circumstances. They noted the derailment of a freight train at Sheffield Midland station on 11 November 2020. “The upper portion of a broken screw may still offer some resistance to rotation or removal by hand, which makes detection of an impending failure by gauge widening difficult,” says the RAIB report. “At the site of the Audenshaw derailment, there were no clear indications of significant baseplate, or baseplate packing, shuffle nor timber indentation.”

It seems difficult for any duty holders to take any action other than extensive inspections of at-risk structures. The RAIB has listed at least seven characteristics which may indicate a higher potential risk to longitudinal timber systems using hardwood timbers. These include the use of the PAN M6 baseplates, or similar, with only two chair screws per plate, and the presence of non-HT chair screws, which may be more susceptible to failure by fatigue. The investigators have also recommended vigilance on packing and ballast movements, and a reappraisal of historical instances of local gauge widening under traffic over a short period. If susceptible structures are widespread across the network, there is potential for significant short-term disruption. Maintenance schedules and services could be thrown into disarray, particularly if intensive inspections reveal any urgent remedial action.

You just read one of our premium articles free of charge

Want full access? Take advantage of our exclusive offer

See the offer

Author: Simon Walton

Simon Walton is RailFreight's UK correspondent.

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.

Manchester derailment prompts urgent bridge safety review across UK | RailFreight.com
accident aftermath

Manchester derailment prompts urgent bridge safety review across UK

An RAIB officer displays a broken screw at Audenshaw, exhibiting fracture characteristics, which prompted the Urgent Safety Advice RAIB / UK Government

A UK government department has taken the unusual step of issuing an official “Urgent Safety Advice” following the derailment of an aggregates train in Manchester in September. The warning is the first such directive of the year. It comes while the official investigation into the accident is still underway. The safety critical level of concern has prompted the immediate warning.

A massively disruptive derailment prompted the call for bridge track work inspections across Britain. Following the derailment in the Audenshaw neighbourhood of Manchester, the UK government’s accident watchdog has warned that other bridges could be susceptible to the same circumstances. That has led to the issue of an Urgent Safety Advice, recommending the immediate inspection of similar infrastructure around the network.

Duty holders take urgent steps

The Rail Accident Investigation Branch is still working on the accident. However, they have issued a warning that existing inspection and maintenance regimes may not be sufficient to detect the failure of critical components. In certain installations, such as that found on the Sidmouth Street bridge, “baseplate chair screws” could fail, which can lead to a loss of lateral track support in longitudinal timber systems. The screws, holding track in place on certain common bridge designs with timber elements, could be in danger of a similar failure to the one that badly derailed an aggregates train in September. There could be wider infrastructure implications if at-risk installations are found elsewhere.

A badly damaged hopper wagon at Audenshaw, Manchester, in the days after the accident. Image: © DB Cargo UK

The RAIB has recommended that all ‘duty holders’ should take urgent steps to consider and mitigate this risk. Those responsible parties principally include the national infrastructure agency Network Rail, upon whom the greatest burden of care will fall. The directive also covers other infrastructure managers, and those companies responsible for maintaining or inspecting longitudinal timber systems.

Gauge spread and broken screws

The accident that prompted the warning happened in the late morning of 6 September this year. “At around 11:25, a freight train travelling between Peak Forest and Salford derailed as it passed over a bridge in Audenshaw, Manchester,” said an RAIB statement. “The train involved was made up of two class 66 locomotives and 24 wagons, which were loaded with aggregate. The locomotives and the leading ten wagons passed safely over the bridge. The next nine wagons derailed, with the last of these coming to a stand on the bridge itself.”

Operations to lift one of the derailed wagons at Audenshaw. Image: © DB Cargo UK

No injuries were caused by the accident. However, the derailment caused substantial damage to railway infrastructure and damaged some of the wagons. “The evidence available at this stage to RAIB’s investigation indicates that the derailment was caused by gauge spread within the first half of the bridge, with the track having transferred from ballasted track to a longitudinal timber system as the train entered the bridge,” said the investigators.

Faults almost impossible to detect

The track geometry at this location is quite complicated. According to the RAIB report, the line curves with a radius of approximately 480 metres and an installed cant of around 40mm. The rails on the bridge were supported on “PAN M6” baseplates held to the timber by only two LSA chair screws. The RAIB recovered 13 failed LSA chair screws from the baseplates of the low-side rail. None of these screws were marked with ‘HT’ on their heads, which indicates that they were probably not made of high-tensile strength material.

Fracture face of the upper portion of a recovered screw with indications of unidirectional high-cycle and low-cycle bending fatigue and a small area of overload (circled). Image: © RAIB / UK Government

Preliminary metallurgical analysis of these failed chair screws exhibit signs of what the specialists call both “low-cycle and high-cycle fatigue failure”. A number of them also exhibited fracturing by overload. In most cases, these failures were one or two threads below the shanks, making them almost impossible to see on visual inspection.

Likely disruptions unavoidable

The RAIB says this type of failure has been seen previously in different circumstances. They noted the derailment of a freight train at Sheffield Midland station on 11 November 2020. “The upper portion of a broken screw may still offer some resistance to rotation or removal by hand, which makes detection of an impending failure by gauge widening difficult,” says the RAIB report. “At the site of the Audenshaw derailment, there were no clear indications of significant baseplate, or baseplate packing, shuffle nor timber indentation.”

It seems difficult for any duty holders to take any action other than extensive inspections of at-risk structures. The RAIB has listed at least seven characteristics which may indicate a higher potential risk to longitudinal timber systems using hardwood timbers. These include the use of the PAN M6 baseplates, or similar, with only two chair screws per plate, and the presence of non-HT chair screws, which may be more susceptible to failure by fatigue. The investigators have also recommended vigilance on packing and ballast movements, and a reappraisal of historical instances of local gauge widening under traffic over a short period. If susceptible structures are widespread across the network, there is potential for significant short-term disruption. Maintenance schedules and services could be thrown into disarray, particularly if intensive inspections reveal any urgent remedial action.

You just read one of our premium articles free of charge

Want full access? Take advantage of our exclusive offer

See the offer

Author: Simon Walton

Simon Walton is RailFreight's UK correspondent.

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.