British supermarket chain keeps shelves stocked thanks to rail
Class 88 Tesco intermodal (DRS)
Tesco, Britain’s biggest grocery retailer says it has beaten supply chain issues by increasing its use of rail freight. The giant retailer has told markets it has not stopped yet and intends to increase its use of trains to distribute produce by almost forty per cent. Management has credited investment in rail freight for helping to keep its shelves stocked despite Britain’s heavy goods vehicle driver crisis.
Do you want to read this article?
Create a free account and get access to all RailFreight Premium content until 1 May!
After this date your free account will automatically expire.
Utter garbage, as a bulk of freight i$ treansportedby Road
ONCE AGAIN THE TRAINSPOTTER COMMUNITY HAVE GOT IT WRONG.
The Road haulage industry is not plagued by strikes or industrial action by the stranglehold of the unions. We are wasting millions of pounds on the rail network. Its out of date, too expensive and too inefficient to be effective.
Not seen too many trains in the High Street delivering goods. This statement by Tesco is total crap, trains are doomed to failure.
John Darraugh, the only statement that is total crap is yours, the trains can carry the freight to terminals and rail ports all over the uk, thus reducing the amount of trucks on the roads. How long and how many trucks would it take to bring the freight from not just Spain but all over the world? Trains bring them closer to their customers and then yes it’s transported by road! It is far cheaper to transport the goods by train throughout the uk than to use trucks for the whole journey!
John Durraugh’s comments are quite surprising. This country has been crying out for rall to set itself up to unburden our roads from the grip of so many HGVs. Let’s hope this is just the start of that process being able to remove a many as possible. It is the aim of government to do just this with the introduction of HS2.
I didn’t realise that RailFreight.com was part of the “trainsporting community” (whoever they may be), and am grateful for Mr Darraugh’s well-considered points.
Do I discern a slight note of sarcasm in Mr. Rickett’s opinion on Mr.Darraugh’s “well-considered points”?!
I would have thought it was obvious to everyone-perhaps with the exception of Mr.Darraugh-to get as much freight as it suitable off the road and onto rail.
Do I detect a slight note of sarcasm in Mr.Ricketts comment on Mr.Darraugh’s “well-considered points”?!
Surely it is obvious to most people-Mr.Darraugh perhaps being a notable exception-that it would be desirable to get as much freight-where suitable-off road and onto rail.
I do assume that John Darraugh’s comments are in jest. In these months of high visibility around climate change mitigation, water (canals) and rail are by far the least polluting means of transport.
The smaller chains like Co op could be using old passenger stock for transport of cages, then 1 driver could pick up from local hubs like a main city station in the evenings. That would remove hundreds of driver vacancies.
The great thing about rail is it removes the need for multiple warehouses in different regions as your not needing to worry about drivers hours anymore.